to be included in the biography of a person. Research that analyzes articles, talk pages, or other content on Wikipedia is not typically controversial, since all of Wikipedia is open and freely usable. The response was overwhelming. Focus on improving the encyclopedia itself, rather than demanding more from other Wikipedians.
Hamlet essay about hamlet's madness
Dishonesty in society essay
Beyond that, "being objectionable" is generally not sufficient grounds for the removal of content. See also Wikipedia:Overcategorization for this issue in categories. User pages that move beyond broad expressions of sexual orientation are unacceptable. He is the only project manager I have had who gave me consistent and constructive feedback, importantly, both positive and negative. Although there are debates about the encyclopedic merits of several classes why smoking is bad for you persuasive essay of entries, consensus is that the following are good examples of what Wikipedia is not. Wikipedia is not a manual, guidebook, textbook, or scientific journal Wikipedia is an encyclopedic reference, not an instruction manual, guidebook, or textbook.