a critical theory of the history of philosophy, of the sociology of science, of political philosophy, of ethical theory, and of social and political institutions. Weber takes care to refute such views in his discussion of the methodology of political economy in "The Nation State literary analysis essay on a worn path and Economic Policy." First, Weber assails those economists who maintain that political economy can derive its own ideals from the subject matter. Let us count the ways.
He considers his position fallibilist and critical rationalist, because he accepts evidence to justify belief in a theory only if the evidence results from attempts to refute. It will also provide a defensible concept of scientific progress and of scientific knowledge (almost by definition)knowledge as what the scientific process produces. According to his methodological anarchism, any so-called methodological rule, including logical consistency, could be fruitfully violated in some contexts. Reprinted in Ian. Science as a model of rationality. Methodological innovation typically follows rather than precedes innovative work (Hull 1988; Dennett 1995; Nickles 2009, forthcoming). Popper adopted his view and argued that the memorization of important material by repetition would be replaced with a Selzian, problem-orientated approach. The problem was to produce a new dynamical model of science that would capture these patterns and rationally motivate them. In any case, contrary to Kuhn, two or more research programs may exist side-by-side. 7, later rejected the intuitionistic elements that gave normative punch to this model.) His response to the rationality question was to propose a thoroughgoing, explicitly pragmatic, problem-solving account of science.