Essay on The Pros and Cons of Animal Testing The argument as to whether or not animal testing. Central Idea By going the extra mile in using safer alternatives when experimenting with animals will french revolution nationalism essay not only prevent conflicts from pro-life activists, it will minimize lawsuits and morals will be preserved. Many activist do not realize the benefits of testing on animals. Words: 984 - Pages: 4, animal Testing Essay, animal testing is use of animals in experimental ways for the benefit of biomedical research, and it has been a topic long argued about. The rabbits' bodies are in a box so that only their head protrudes.
Many animals are very similar to humans and by studying the brains of monkeys Roger W Sperry made a huge discovery about the human brain for mankind. In 1981 Roger Sperry, David Hubel and Torsten Wiesel were awarded a Nobel Prize for research in brain function by studying monkeys. Hoarders are people in which own many animals, which they cannot take care. Animal testing is wrong based on these premises: there are available alternatives to direct testing on live animals, the results acquired rom the tests are inaccurate and repetitive, and ultimately it is speciesism, which is comparable to racism Words: 1198 - Pages: 5 Essay. Approximately 225 million animals are used for testing every year. For many centuries scientists and testers in research have used animals of all kinds. Download full paper, gRAB THE best paper, read Text. Without animal research, the development of antibiotics and insulin would have been delayed.